Molly Moon’s Ice Cream in Seattle has the gall to sue the City of Seattle for abandoning the East Precinct, a move that led to the Capitol Hill Occupied Protest (CHOP). It’s an ironic position given the ice cream maker promoted CHOP.
The shop’s lawyer argued Molly Moon’s “does not seek to undermine CHOP participants’ message or present a counter-message.” Yet it inexplicably also claims the city materially supported and encouraged “a hostile occupation of that neighborhood.”
The ice cream maker’s owner, Molly Neitzel, should look in the mirror. It was Molly Moon’s that materially supported and encouraged CHOP. And if they’re not undermining the message of those participating in
→ Continue reading at MyNorthwest